Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 00:41

Sending ATACMS is WW3.
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
Oregon State leaves no doubt, outslug Florida State to reach College World Series - OregonLive.com
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Taylor Swift Wears a Bejeweled LBD for a Celebratory Girls Night Out with Selena Gomez - instyle.com
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Russia can stop this any time.
The world needs the United States, but the USA doesn't need the world. Is this true?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Oldest human DNA ever found tells the story of a lost branch on the human family tree - Earth.com
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
The 6 Best High-Protein Snacks to Buy at Aldi, Recommended by a Dietitian - EatingWell
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
US won't label China a currency manipulator amid tariff war - AP News
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.